Monkey Business

These are soo cute.

Joanie posted:

These are soo cute.

Thanks, Joanie! <3

So very adorable and fun . That tiny flower in the little guy's arm is great!

Super cute, Kim. Though just a reminder that "3-D cookies" on this site are defined to be multi-cookie constructions. So cookies that have some dimension from fondant or royal icing do not belong in this clip set. I've removed this one (and many of your others) from that set for this reason. 

Julia M. Usher posted:

Super cute, Kim. Though just a reminder that "3-D cookies" on this site are defined to be multi-cookie constructions. So cookies that have some dimension from fondant or royal icing do not belong in this clip set. I've removed this one (and many of your others) from that set for this reason. 

You must have had to go way back. Sorry.  3-D is sort of what I do as a style. One of the things that drew me to sugar art was fondant and the ability to paint, sculpt, draw and put it all together to achieve the picture in my mind. I will stay away from this tag in future (unless I add more cookies to one piece). God bless, Kim

swissophie posted:

So very adorable and fun . That tiny flower in the little guy's arm is great!

Thank you, Sophie! This is part of a larger set for a baby (girl) shower. I tried to pop pink flowers in here and there. I'm glad you like it!

Kim Damon posted:

Julia M. Usher posted:

Super cute, Kim. Though just a reminder that "3-D cookies" on this site are defined to be multi-cookie constructions. So cookies that have some dimension from fondant or royal icing do not belong in this clip set. I've removed this one (and many of your others) from that set for this reason. 

You must have had to go way back. Sorry.  3-D is sort of what I do as a style. One of the things that drew me to sugar art was fondant and the ability to paint, sculpt, draw and put it all together to achieve the picture in my mind. I will stay away from this tag in future (unless I add more cookies to one piece). God bless, Kim

Yes, I know that's your approach, and I love it! Lots of other cookies on the site have dimension too (nearly all of them now) without ever putting multiple cookies together, but each clip set has a definition so that people can reliably find what they're looking for in searches, etc. I've been changing classifications all along, just never pointing it out (though you should get auto-alerts when your clips are edited).

That all said, feel free to TAG your cookies as 3-D or "dimensional fondant", but the clip sets all have definitions associated with them (if you click on the clip set title anywhere, you will see it at the top of the page). It just helps to keep the site more orderly (searches more helpful and predictable) if the photos posted to a clip set are consistent with its definition. The multiple cookie definition is a little more defined and less all-inclusive, but this then makes it easier to find constructions on the site. Dimensional fondant is pretty easy to isolate under the "fondant" clip set, as most fondant cookies that have been posted here are very dimensional.

Anyway, no biggie, but as I was cleaning up other posts last night, I thought I would point this out.

Julia M. Usher posted:

Kim Damon posted:

Julia M. Usher posted:

Super cute, Kim. Though just a reminder that "3-D cookies" on this site are defined to be multi-cookie constructions. So cookies that have some dimension from fondant or royal icing do not belong in this clip set. I've removed this one (and many of your others) from that set for this reason. 

You must have had to go way back. Sorry.  3-D is sort of what I do as a style. One of the things that drew me to sugar art was fondant and the ability to paint, sculpt, draw and put it all together to achieve the picture in my mind. I will stay away from this tag in future (unless I add more cookies to one piece). God bless, Kim

Yes, I know that's your approach, and I love it! Lots of other cookies on the site have dimension too (nearly all of them now) without ever putting multiple cookies together, but each clip set has a definition so that people can reliably find what they're looking for in searches, etc. I've been changing classifications all along, just never pointing it out (though you should get auto-alerts when your clips are edited).

That all said, feel free to TAG your cookies as 3-D or "dimensional fondant", but the clip sets all have definitions associated with them (if you click on the clip set title anywhere, you will see it at the top of the page). It just helps to keep the site more orderly (searches more helpful and predictable) if the photos posted to a clip set are consistent with its definition. The multiple cookie definition is a little more defined and less all-inclusive, but this then makes it easier to find constructions on the site. Dimensional fondant is pretty easy to isolate under the "fondant" clip set, as most fondant cookies that have been posted here are very dimensional.

Anyway, no biggie, but as I was cleaning up other posts last night, I thought I would point this out.

OK, sounds good. Thanks for the clarification. 3D Tag, Not 3DSet. I love this site. Very cool to see so much art all in one place. I can imagine managing it all would call for good processes and guidelines. I'll try and make sure to stick to the guidelines (even as they evolve). Thanks for all you do.